<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the PageRank Drop From Google Webmaster Tools a Ploy To Get SEOs Not Focus on PR to Build Links or Do They Think It’s Really Irrelevant?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://palatnikfactor.com/2009/10/19/is-the-pagerank-drop-from-google-webmaster-tools-a-ploy-to-get-seos-not-focus-on-pr-to-build-links-or-do-they-think-it%e2%80%99s-really-irrelevant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2009/10/19/is-the-pagerank-drop-from-google-webmaster-tools-a-ploy-to-get-seos-not-focus-on-pr-to-build-links-or-do-they-think-it%e2%80%99s-really-irrelevant/</link>
	<description>Online Marketing Tips &#38; Online Marketing Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:17:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google Re-Naming and Re-Branding Google PageRank? &#124; PalatnikFactor.com</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2009/10/19/is-the-pagerank-drop-from-google-webmaster-tools-a-ploy-to-get-seos-not-focus-on-pr-to-build-links-or-do-they-think-it%e2%80%99s-really-irrelevant/#comment-33060</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Re-Naming and Re-Branding Google PageRank? &#124; PalatnikFactor.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 19:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/?p=1331#comment-33060</guid>
		<description>[...] {Read the post: Is the PageRank Drop From Google Webmaster Tools a Ploy To Get SEOs Not Focus on PR to Build Links o...} [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] {Read the post: Is the PageRank Drop From Google Webmaster Tools a Ploy To Get SEOs Not Focus on PR to Build Links o&#8230;} [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Smith</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2009/10/19/is-the-pagerank-drop-from-google-webmaster-tools-a-ploy-to-get-seos-not-focus-on-pr-to-build-links-or-do-they-think-it%e2%80%99s-really-irrelevant/#comment-31793</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/?p=1331#comment-31793</guid>
		<description>Impressive commentary about SEO. I&#039;m frankly stunned that that has not been enunciated earlier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Impressive commentary about SEO. I&#8217;m frankly stunned that that has not been enunciated earlier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: indexed by google</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2009/10/19/is-the-pagerank-drop-from-google-webmaster-tools-a-ploy-to-get-seos-not-focus-on-pr-to-build-links-or-do-they-think-it%e2%80%99s-really-irrelevant/#comment-31782</link>
		<dc:creator>indexed by google</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 05:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/?p=1331#comment-31782</guid>
		<description>! I hadn&#039;t considered the evidently simple ways the big G worked in. The matter is that even though a spider looks at your page abundant times, it takes a ton of effort on your part to get a website to become interesting to Google. I guess this will add to my understanding of SEO!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>! I hadn&#8217;t considered the evidently simple ways the big G worked in. The matter is that even though a spider looks at your page abundant times, it takes a ton of effort on your part to get a website to become interesting to Google. I guess this will add to my understanding of SEO!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
