<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nofollow&#8217;s Role in SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://palatnikfactor.com/2009/05/11/nofollows-role-in-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2009/05/11/nofollows-role-in-seo/</link>
	<description>Online Marketing for Dummies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:22:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.I.P PageRank Sculpting: If Matt Says So… &#124; PalatnikFactor.com</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2009/05/11/nofollows-role-in-seo/#comment-34136</link>
		<dc:creator>R.I.P PageRank Sculpting: If Matt Says So… &#124; PalatnikFactor.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/?p=1115#comment-34136</guid>
		<description>[...] engine optimization professionals started using the nofollow attribute to control the flow of PageRank within a website, but Google since corrected this error, and any [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] engine optimization professionals started using the nofollow attribute to control the flow of PageRank within a website, but Google since corrected this error, and any [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rental Management Company</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2009/05/11/nofollows-role-in-seo/#comment-30942</link>
		<dc:creator>Rental Management Company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/?p=1115#comment-30942</guid>
		<description>No follow tags just helps to increase the traffic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No follow tags just helps to increase the traffic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seo expert</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2009/05/11/nofollows-role-in-seo/#comment-30902</link>
		<dc:creator>seo expert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 11:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/?p=1115#comment-30902</guid>
		<description>No follow tag and follow tag, grate insight! thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No follow tag and follow tag, grate insight! thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: low voltage wiring</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2009/05/11/nofollows-role-in-seo/#comment-30891</link>
		<dc:creator>low voltage wiring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 18:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/?p=1115#comment-30891</guid>
		<description>I agree with using both Nofollow and Follow links to diversify. When I check Site Explorer for the links that I have built it does list the Nofollow links also sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with using both Nofollow and Follow links to diversify. When I check Site Explorer for the links that I have built it does list the Nofollow links also sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chicago office</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2009/05/11/nofollows-role-in-seo/#comment-30890</link>
		<dc:creator>chicago office</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 18:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/?p=1115#comment-30890</guid>
		<description>I agree with using both Nofollow and Follow links to diversify. When I check Site Explorer for the links that I have built it does list the Nofollow links also sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with using both Nofollow and Follow links to diversify. When I check Site Explorer for the links that I have built it does list the Nofollow links also sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kpilist</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2009/05/11/nofollows-role-in-seo/#comment-30884</link>
		<dc:creator>kpilist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 21:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/?p=1115#comment-30884</guid>
		<description>We have wondered about the &quot;spread&quot; factor since the Rel=nofollow came out in Jan. 2005 see http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2005/01/preventing-comment-spam.html

Now we are discussing whether they are looking at the count of nofollow links in our mix whereas supposedly there is only a fraction of 1% (non sculpting) links that are nofollowed. If we hold this data to be true or close to the truth, this mix issue should only come up when blogs with auto rel=nofollow links built-in begin to surpass those of the regular static site (and no links anymore!). Plus: the fact that google does look at which part of the architecture where you are linked, I think they are busy trying to build on making their deep link crawling more efficient and normally checking linking rates (100&#039;s in one day all to like sources) as this would hurt you. But without a single no=follow I suppose this could tell google et al. that your site is being linked to and not out by interested parties. Is this a dead topic or am I off here. (BTW I checked, your blog uses the no=follow tag)_Thanks. 

Kpilist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have wondered about the &#8220;spread&#8221; factor since the Rel=nofollow came out in Jan. 2005 see <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2005/01/preventing-comment-spam.html" rel="nofollow">http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2005/01/preventing-comment-spam.html</a></p>
<p>Now we are discussing whether they are looking at the count of nofollow links in our mix whereas supposedly there is only a fraction of 1% (non sculpting) links that are nofollowed. If we hold this data to be true or close to the truth, this mix issue should only come up when blogs with auto rel=nofollow links built-in begin to surpass those of the regular static site (and no links anymore!). Plus: the fact that google does look at which part of the architecture where you are linked, I think they are busy trying to build on making their deep link crawling more efficient and normally checking linking rates (100&#8242;s in one day all to like sources) as this would hurt you. But without a single no=follow I suppose this could tell google et al. that your site is being linked to and not out by interested parties. Is this a dead topic or am I off here. (BTW I checked, your blog uses the no=follow tag)_Thanks. </p>
<p>Kpilist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seo company india</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2009/05/11/nofollows-role-in-seo/#comment-30882</link>
		<dc:creator>Seo company india</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 04:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/?p=1115#comment-30882</guid>
		<description>A good post indeed which givs us an idea about no follow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good post indeed which givs us an idea about no follow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

