<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guide to Google Quality Score (Video)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://palatnikfactor.com/2008/12/05/guide-to-google-quality-score-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2008/12/05/guide-to-google-quality-score-video/</link>
	<description>Online Marketing for Dummies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:22:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 Things You Should Know About Quality Score &#124; PalatnikFactor.com</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2008/12/05/guide-to-google-quality-score-video/#comment-31077</link>
		<dc:creator>10 Things You Should Know About Quality Score &#124; PalatnikFactor.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/?p=852#comment-31077</guid>
		<description>[...] those advertisers that have been running Adwords for quite sometime, Quality Score is something we have come to get very familiar with over the past 2-3 years. It determines a few [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] those advertisers that have been running Adwords for quite sometime, Quality Score is something we have come to get very familiar with over the past 2-3 years. It determines a few [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google- YOU&#8217;RE not Transparent, You Hypocrites. &#124; PalatnikFactor.com</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2008/12/05/guide-to-google-quality-score-video/#comment-30788</link>
		<dc:creator>Google- YOU&#8217;RE not Transparent, You Hypocrites. &#124; PalatnikFactor.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 04:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/?p=852#comment-30788</guid>
		<description>[...] should be pleasing your customers (NOT JUST USERS, WHAT ABOUT ADVERTISERS?!?) I&#8217;ve read the quality score guidelines 10 times and as an online marketer who has done this for a living for a long time now, I find it a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] should be pleasing your customers (NOT JUST USERS, WHAT ABOUT ADVERTISERS?!?) I&#8217;ve read the quality score guidelines 10 times and as an online marketer who has done this for a living for a long time now, I find it a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Google Adwords REALLY Works &#124; PalatnikFactor.com</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2008/12/05/guide-to-google-quality-score-video/#comment-30669</link>
		<dc:creator>How Google Adwords REALLY Works &#124; PalatnikFactor.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/?p=852#comment-30669</guid>
		<description>[...] Guide to Google Quality Score (Video) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Guide to Google Quality Score (Video) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Adwords Blog 10 Best Post of 2008 &#124; PalatnikFactor.com</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2008/12/05/guide-to-google-quality-score-video/#comment-30323</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Adwords Blog 10 Best Post of 2008 &#124; PalatnikFactor.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/?p=852#comment-30323</guid>
		<description>[...] Guide to Google Quality Score (Video) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Guide to Google Quality Score (Video) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Der SEOdiotische Wochenrückblick - KW50 &#124; Der SEOdiot</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2008/12/05/guide-to-google-quality-score-video/#comment-30287</link>
		<dc:creator>Der SEOdiotische Wochenrückblick - KW50 &#124; Der SEOdiot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/?p=852#comment-30287</guid>
		<description>[...] Factor - Guide to Google Quality Score Das ist zwar eher nur für AdWords interessant - aber ähnliche Qualitätsüberlegungen sollten [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Factor &#8211; Guide to Google Quality Score Das ist zwar eher nur für AdWords interessant &#8211; aber ähnliche Qualitätsüberlegungen sollten [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo Palatnik</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2008/12/05/guide-to-google-quality-score-video/#comment-30220</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo Palatnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 18:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/?p=852#comment-30220</guid>
		<description>Hi Bitstar,

Let me try and help you out a bit. Let me ask you some questions and lets see where we are this point with your campaign?

1) How many keywords are you bidding for? 

2) How many keywords do you have per ad group?

3) Do your ads have the keywords you are bidding on?

Just a note, looking at the source of your site, there seems to be a lot of Java Script if im not mistaken...I dont think Google looks at that favorably on a landing page. 

I would make it a lot more simple html if possible but the site in itself doesnt look that bad at all. 

**You have no keywords for any of your ALT tags.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bitstar,</p>
<p>Let me try and help you out a bit. Let me ask you some questions and lets see where we are this point with your campaign?</p>
<p>1) How many keywords are you bidding for? </p>
<p>2) How many keywords do you have per ad group?</p>
<p>3) Do your ads have the keywords you are bidding on?</p>
<p>Just a note, looking at the source of your site, there seems to be a lot of Java Script if im not mistaken&#8230;I dont think Google looks at that favorably on a landing page. </p>
<p>I would make it a lot more simple html if possible but the site in itself doesnt look that bad at all. </p>
<p>**You have no keywords for any of your ALT tags.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BitStar</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2008/12/05/guide-to-google-quality-score-video/#comment-30217</link>
		<dc:creator>BitStar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 09:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/?p=852#comment-30217</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had problems with QS from the beginning. I have a jobs web site and I&#039;ve set some very relevant keywords that are both found in good density in the landing page and in the text ad. Anything more would be keyword spam.

Google however still thinks the landing page is not relevant. I think there is a bug in their algorithm. I&#039;ve made everything required in the guide. This is may landing page:

http://www.itjobhunt.com/ro/?ad=jobs

The page is not in english but if you change the language on the page you will see it in english too.

I&#039;d really need some help!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had problems with QS from the beginning. I have a jobs web site and I&#8217;ve set some very relevant keywords that are both found in good density in the landing page and in the text ad. Anything more would be keyword spam.</p>
<p>Google however still thinks the landing page is not relevant. I think there is a bug in their algorithm. I&#8217;ve made everything required in the guide. This is may landing page:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.itjobhunt.com/ro/?ad=jobs" rel="nofollow">http://www.itjobhunt.com/ro/?ad=jobs</a></p>
<p>The page is not in english but if you change the language on the page you will see it in english too.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d really need some help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

