<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Predicting Top Online Marketing Trends for 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://palatnikfactor.com/2008/11/17/predicting-top-online-marketing-trends-for-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2008/11/17/predicting-top-online-marketing-trends-for-2009/</link>
	<description>Online Marketing Tips &#38; Online Marketing Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:26:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul in Chicago</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2008/11/17/predicting-top-online-marketing-trends-for-2009/#comment-30097</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul in Chicago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/?p=756#comment-30097</guid>
		<description>Any predictions on the demographic trends for social media sites - facebook, twitter, myspace, etc.? As I&#039;m new to twitter, some of my facebook friends call it as the place for people with limited attention spans since the updates are so frequent. I&#039;m wondering if twitter will have it&#039;s nitch while a portion of people stay on more static social media sites like the facebook and myspace.

And the bigger question...how many active memberships does the average person have to these sites? Does joe blow maintain 4 active memberships to facebook, friendster, twitter, and yelp? Or do most people stick with only one social media site and if they explore outside of that their profiles are nominal at best? Curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any predictions on the demographic trends for social media sites &#8211; facebook, twitter, myspace, etc.? As I&#8217;m new to twitter, some of my facebook friends call it as the place for people with limited attention spans since the updates are so frequent. I&#8217;m wondering if twitter will have it&#8217;s nitch while a portion of people stay on more static social media sites like the facebook and myspace.</p>
<p>And the bigger question&#8230;how many active memberships does the average person have to these sites? Does joe blow maintain 4 active memberships to facebook, friendster, twitter, and yelp? Or do most people stick with only one social media site and if they explore outside of that their profiles are nominal at best? Curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo Palatnik</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2008/11/17/predicting-top-online-marketing-trends-for-2009/#comment-30019</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo Palatnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/?p=756#comment-30019</guid>
		<description>@ Rolv-

I&#039;d have to agree with you 100% and surprised I didnt touch on it in the post. 

Local search has continued to grow and grow and wont be going anywhere and only increased popularity and demand amongst small business and im sure engines and websites will continue to build technology to target more locally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Rolv-</p>
<p>I&#8217;d have to agree with you 100% and surprised I didnt touch on it in the post. </p>
<p>Local search has continued to grow and grow and wont be going anywhere and only increased popularity and demand amongst small business and im sure engines and websites will continue to build technology to target more locally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2008/11/17/predicting-top-online-marketing-trends-for-2009/#comment-30018</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/?p=756#comment-30018</guid>
		<description>Although I am somewhat biased, I believe &quot;local search&quot; will be a major continuing trend</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I am somewhat biased, I believe &#8220;local search&#8221; will be a major continuing trend</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Marketing Trends for 2009?</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2008/11/17/predicting-top-online-marketing-trends-for-2009/#comment-30017</link>
		<dc:creator>Top Marketing Trends for 2009?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/?p=756#comment-30017</guid>
		<description>[...] Marketing Trends for 2009?      I wrote a blog post: Predicting Top Online Marketing Trends for 2009 &#124; PalatnikFactor.com   I want to hear what you guys think will be the top trends for this coming year and take some view [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Marketing Trends for 2009?      I wrote a blog post: Predicting Top Online Marketing Trends for 2009 | PalatnikFactor.com   I want to hear what you guys think will be the top trends for this coming year and take some view [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rolv Heggenhougen</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2008/11/17/predicting-top-online-marketing-trends-for-2009/#comment-30004</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolv Heggenhougen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/?p=756#comment-30004</guid>
		<description>Companies seem to ignore the single largest online advertising venue available: their own regular external emails. Why not use these emails to market the senders company?

You have a website.
You send emails.

Why not multiply your sales-staff by “wrapping” the regular email in an interactive letterhead?

No other marketing or advertising medium is as targeted as an email between people that know each other (as opposed to mass emails). These emails are always read and typically kept.

WrapMail offers a solution that is server-based (i.e. compatible with all email clients), has a complete back-office with a WrapMaker, reporting etc and only charge $5 per user per month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Companies seem to ignore the single largest online advertising venue available: their own regular external emails. Why not use these emails to market the senders company?</p>
<p>You have a website.<br />
You send emails.</p>
<p>Why not multiply your sales-staff by “wrapping” the regular email in an interactive letterhead?</p>
<p>No other marketing or advertising medium is as targeted as an email between people that know each other (as opposed to mass emails). These emails are always read and typically kept.</p>
<p>WrapMail offers a solution that is server-based (i.e. compatible with all email clients), has a complete back-office with a WrapMaker, reporting etc and only charge $5 per user per month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
