<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PageRank Update: To Follow or Not To Follow?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://palatnikfactor.com/2008/01/13/pagerank-update-to-follow-or-not-to-follow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2008/01/13/pagerank-update-to-follow-or-not-to-follow/</link>
	<description>Online Marketing Tips &#38; Online Marketing Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:26:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Is the PageRank Drop From Google Webmaster Tools a Ploy To Get SEOs Not Focus on PR to Build Links or Do They Think It’s Really Irrelevant? &#124; PalatnikFactor.com</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2008/01/13/pagerank-update-to-follow-or-not-to-follow/#comment-31309</link>
		<dc:creator>Is the PageRank Drop From Google Webmaster Tools a Ploy To Get SEOs Not Focus on PR to Build Links or Do They Think It’s Really Irrelevant? &#124; PalatnikFactor.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/2008/01/13/pagerank-update-to-follow-or-not-to-follow/#comment-31309</guid>
		<description>[...] PageRank Update: To Follow or Not To Follow? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PageRank Update: To Follow or Not To Follow? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarkipedia, Edit</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2008/01/13/pagerank-update-to-follow-or-not-to-follow/#comment-11805</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarkipedia, Edit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/2008/01/13/pagerank-update-to-follow-or-not-to-follow/#comment-11805</guid>
		<description>Where can i found a List History is a list of the dates that Page rank was updated.
Edit - http://www.sarkipedia.com/sarki/e3.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where can i found a List History is a list of the dates that Page rank was updated.<br />
Edit &#8211; <a href="http://www.sarkipedia.com/sarki/e3.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.sarkipedia.com/sarki/e3.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HalfDeck</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2008/01/13/pagerank-update-to-follow-or-not-to-follow/#comment-11773</link>
		<dc:creator>HalfDeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 02:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/2008/01/13/pagerank-update-to-follow-or-not-to-follow/#comment-11773</guid>
		<description>{From Sphinn}

&quot;What could have caused this demotion in Pagerank? Any pagerank updates on anyones site?&quot;

One possibility, which Matt Cutts pointed out, is that links in the SEO niche are passing less value that before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>{From Sphinn}</p>
<p>&#8220;What could have caused this demotion in Pagerank? Any pagerank updates on anyones site?&#8221;</p>
<p>One possibility, which Matt Cutts pointed out, is that links in the SEO niche are passing less value that before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brandon</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2008/01/13/pagerank-update-to-follow-or-not-to-follow/#comment-11771</link>
		<dc:creator>brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/2008/01/13/pagerank-update-to-follow-or-not-to-follow/#comment-11771</guid>
		<description>{From Sphinn}

I think it was just a coincidence that you PR dropped a point. Adding a no-followed link shouldn&#039;t make any difference. There is, of course, speculation that linking OUT to prominent sites will help boost your pagerank, but it can&#039;t matter for too long --because Google is practically telling everyone to stop linking without nofollow.

Another factor is that it takes quite a while for their algorithm to complete its processing and your recent change was most likely not taken into account for the latest updte.

Plus, it&#039;s been a trend for more than a year that all of the sites seem to be &quot;equalizing&quot; in PageRank anyway. Realistically, this is how it should&#039;ve been all along. An average, somewhat popular blog should only be a 1, 2, or maybe 3 in any index. When considered next to sites that deserve an index of 5,6,7 or 8, it shouldn&#039;t be a typical blog. It should be cnn, amazon, or the likes. That&#039;s my humble opinion, anyway. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>{From Sphinn}</p>
<p>I think it was just a coincidence that you PR dropped a point. Adding a no-followed link shouldn&#8217;t make any difference. There is, of course, speculation that linking OUT to prominent sites will help boost your pagerank, but it can&#8217;t matter for too long &#8211;because Google is practically telling everyone to stop linking without nofollow.</p>
<p>Another factor is that it takes quite a while for their algorithm to complete its processing and your recent change was most likely not taken into account for the latest updte.</p>
<p>Plus, it&#8217;s been a trend for more than a year that all of the sites seem to be &#8220;equalizing&#8221; in PageRank anyway. Realistically, this is how it should&#8217;ve been all along. An average, somewhat popular blog should only be a 1, 2, or maybe 3 in any index. When considered next to sites that deserve an index of 5,6,7 or 8, it shouldn&#8217;t be a typical blog. It should be cnn, amazon, or the likes. That&#8217;s my humble opinion, anyway. <img src='http://palatnikfactor.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
