<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Microsoft The Next Google?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://palatnikfactor.com/2007/10/30/is-microsoft-the-next-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2007/10/30/is-microsoft-the-next-google/</link>
	<description>Online Marketing for Dummies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:22:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo Palatnik</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2007/10/30/is-microsoft-the-next-google/#comment-8635</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo Palatnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/2007/10/30/is-microsoft-the-next-google/#comment-8635</guid>
		<description>I agree with you 100%...I never said Google was worth more than Microsoft...

&quot;The buzz is so loud around the net (blogoshere, news sites, and stock watch) about the Goog, which many see Microsoft as the company that is trailingâ€¦and really, itâ€™s only trailing in terms of search.&quot;

My point is as Google stock raises, the public sees Google as a stronger company from the outside and the company of the future. It was more on stock prices but I never did look at the market cap. Thats good stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you 100%&#8230;I never said Google was worth more than Microsoft&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;The buzz is so loud around the net (blogoshere, news sites, and stock watch) about the Goog, which many see Microsoft as the company that is trailingâ€¦and really, itâ€™s only trailing in terms of search.&#8221;</p>
<p>My point is as Google stock raises, the public sees Google as a stronger company from the outside and the company of the future. It was more on stock prices but I never did look at the market cap. Thats good stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jokumies</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2007/10/30/is-microsoft-the-next-google/#comment-8632</link>
		<dc:creator>Jokumies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/2007/10/30/is-microsoft-the-next-google/#comment-8632</guid>
		<description>Do you know that the value of a companys stock doesn&#039;t tell you anything about the value of the company. You have to multiply the price of the stock with the amount of shares.

Googles stock is worth 712.15 and Googles market cap is 222.32B
Microsofts stock is worth 37.24 and market cap is 348.49B

So Microsoft is almost twice as valuable as Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know that the value of a companys stock doesn&#8217;t tell you anything about the value of the company. You have to multiply the price of the stock with the amount of shares.</p>
<p>Googles stock is worth 712.15 and Googles market cap is 222.32B<br />
Microsofts stock is worth 37.24 and market cap is 348.49B</p>
<p>So Microsoft is almost twice as valuable as Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

