<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube vs. uTube â€“ $1,000 Per Day Name Similarity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://palatnikfactor.com/2007/05/17/youtube-vs-utube-%e2%80%93-1000-per-day-name-similarity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2007/05/17/youtube-vs-utube-%e2%80%93-1000-per-day-name-similarity/</link>
	<description>Online Marketing for Dummies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:22:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sammy</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2007/05/17/youtube-vs-utube-%e2%80%93-1000-per-day-name-similarity/#comment-2413</link>
		<dc:creator>sammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/2007/05/17/youtube-vs-utube-%e2%80%93-1000-per-day-name-similarity/#comment-2413</guid>
		<description>has anyone been to utube.com? They actually sell tubing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>has anyone been to utube.com? They actually sell tubing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neosin</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2007/05/17/youtube-vs-utube-%e2%80%93-1000-per-day-name-similarity/#comment-2408</link>
		<dc:creator>Neosin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 04:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/2007/05/17/youtube-vs-utube-%e2%80%93-1000-per-day-name-similarity/#comment-2408</guid>
		<description>Why didn&#039;t YouTube grab the domain utube when they got the youtube domain. Sounds silly to not grab the domain and because someone else does; start talking about the &quot;loss&quot; coming from it.  How in the world would YouTube even know how much it&#039;s losing when it never owned the domain? Did it only think about it after the fact? Why only when someone else starts making money do they care? GROW UP YOU GREEDY KIDS. Show us why YouTube is so much better than utube!! Don&#039;t be a kid and try to sue when someone else picks up a domain that &quot;sounds&quot; like yours. What a bunch or overpaid crybabies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why didn&#8217;t YouTube grab the domain utube when they got the youtube domain. Sounds silly to not grab the domain and because someone else does; start talking about the &#8220;loss&#8221; coming from it.  How in the world would YouTube even know how much it&#8217;s losing when it never owned the domain? Did it only think about it after the fact? Why only when someone else starts making money do they care? GROW UP YOU GREEDY KIDS. Show us why YouTube is so much better than utube!! Don&#8217;t be a kid and try to sue when someone else picks up a domain that &#8220;sounds&#8221; like yours. What a bunch or overpaid crybabies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo Palatnik</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2007/05/17/youtube-vs-utube-%e2%80%93-1000-per-day-name-similarity/#comment-2399</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo Palatnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/2007/05/17/youtube-vs-utube-%e2%80%93-1000-per-day-name-similarity/#comment-2399</guid>
		<description>I think uTube did a great thing from profiting from the name similarity, no doubt. My problem is with the whole lawsuit issue. If I owned uTube, I&#039;d just keep capitalizing on the traffic..or sell it as well before the traffic dies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think uTube did a great thing from profiting from the name similarity, no doubt. My problem is with the whole lawsuit issue. If I owned uTube, I&#8217;d just keep capitalizing on the traffic..or sell it as well before the traffic dies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2007/05/17/youtube-vs-utube-%e2%80%93-1000-per-day-name-similarity/#comment-2397</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/2007/05/17/youtube-vs-utube-%e2%80%93-1000-per-day-name-similarity/#comment-2397</guid>
		<description>Hey, 

I saw a piece on this a while back ... back before uTube had the advertisements on their landing page.

At that time, uTube was complaining about the bandwidth costs of having all the extra traffic hitting their site. 

It seems reasonable to me that uTube would put an advertisement on their landing page to recoup the expense of the misdirrected traffic. 

You may notice that the ad only appears on the landing page and no other pages @ uTube.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, </p>
<p>I saw a piece on this a while back &#8230; back before uTube had the advertisements on their landing page.</p>
<p>At that time, uTube was complaining about the bandwidth costs of having all the extra traffic hitting their site. </p>
<p>It seems reasonable to me that uTube would put an advertisement on their landing page to recoup the expense of the misdirrected traffic. </p>
<p>You may notice that the ad only appears on the landing page and no other pages @ uTube.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geri Mayer</title>
		<link>http://palatnikfactor.com/2007/05/17/youtube-vs-utube-%e2%80%93-1000-per-day-name-similarity/#comment-736</link>
		<dc:creator>Geri Mayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 17:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palatnikfactor.com/2007/05/17/youtube-vs-utube-%e2%80%93-1000-per-day-name-similarity/#comment-736</guid>
		<description>wow, thats impressive. I wonder if youtube has asked to buy utube? im sure thats what they are waiting around for, utube that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, thats impressive. I wonder if youtube has asked to buy utube? im sure thats what they are waiting around for, utube that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

